From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9593DDDED for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:33:50 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:50:01 -0600 From: Scott Wood To: dwmw2@infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Freescale enhanced Local Bus Controller FCM NAND support. Message-ID: <20071215035001.GB20533@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <20071214221736.GA21231@loki.buserror.net> <20071215025851.GA8430@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20071215025851.GA8430@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 01:58:51PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 04:17:36PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Nick Spence > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood > > --- > > Fixed some formatting issues, removed some leftover debugging cruft, > > and added a comment about potential conflicts in the interrupt > > handling. > > Why is the NAND MTD driver specific to the elbc bus? Because the NAND flash controller is part of the elbc. > And why does it bind to the elbc node, rather than the nand node under > it? The FCM registers are part of the eLBC register block; the chip select mapping is just a data buffer. -Scott