From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e1.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C160DDDD04 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:06:12 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBIC68HJ002371 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:06:08 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lBIC68mN129708 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:06:08 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lBIC68hh001285 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:06:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:01:05 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: Raising list size limit Message-ID: <20071218060105.368f0bd4@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20071218143627.94f76142.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20071218143627.94f76142.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:36:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > I am considering raising the limit on the size of postings to 400k. Does > anyone have a real problem with this? Limiting message size was done to > limit the damage of larges spams (and we don;t get very many of those on > the list) and to ease the pain for people downloading emails over a slow > (like dialup) link (and are there many of those left?). Fine by me! josh