From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pasmtpA.tele.dk (pasmtpa.tele.dk [80.160.77.114]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1196DDDEC9 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 07:26:46 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:00:18 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 18/43] powerpc compat_binfmt_elf Message-ID: <20071221200018.GA17164@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20071220115200.C767E26F98A@magilla.localdomain> <20071220115816.504CC26F98E@magilla.localdomain> <20071221071229.GC4345@infradead.org> <20071221085609.4D53B26F98A@magilla.localdomain> <20071221175106.GB17656@fattire.cabal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20071221175106.GB17656@fattire.cabal.ca> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Roland McGrath List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 12:51:06PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 12:56:09AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 03:58:16AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += ../../../fs/compat_binfmt_elf.o > > > > > > Building files from another directory is nasty. Please add a > > > CONFIG_BINFMT_COMPAT_ELF so we can simply build it in fs/ > > > > If that's better, please post the precise Kconfig magic you have in mind to > > have it set when it should be. Kyle made a proposal but I like to get in to the party too... > > > > Just taking a stab that hch means, > > config BINFMT_COMPAT_ELF > def_bool n > depends on 64BIT > > and then in arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > config COMPAT > bool > default y if PPC64 > select BINFMT_COMPAT_ELF > > or somesuch. We recently discussed a common prefix for the selctable symbols and consensus pointed out "HAVE_" so let us try to use it. I did not quite understand the "depends on 64BIT" in Kyles example. Does we really want to use compat_binfmt_elf for all archs that define 64BIT? Anyway I added this in the example below. fs/Makefile: obj-$(COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF) += compat_binfmt_elf.o fs/Kconfig: config COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF depends on HAVE_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF || 64BIT # COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF must be selected when an # architecture supoorts ... config HAVE_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF arch/powerpc/Kconfig: config COMPAT bool default PPC64 select HAVE_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF In the example above the extra indirection: HAVE_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF => COMPAT_BNFMT_ELF is not really needed but tomorrow when we add another "depends on" to COMPAT_INFMT_ELF it is needed to avoid the misbehaving select that just ignore the dependencies and select the symbol anyway. Sam