From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2232DDDEA for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:11:13 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:18:23 -0600 From: Olof Johansson To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add information on enabling sound on the MPC8641 HPCN Message-ID: <20071226021823.GA28651@lixom.net> References: <11983809443854-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20071223152613.GA4817@lixom.net> <476FEB43.8050507@freescale.com> <20071224231042.GA4588@lixom.net> <47716B3A.9050008@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <47716B3A.9050008@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 02:42:34PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: > >> Are freescale customers really used to going to the linux device tree >> sources to find out how to modify their boards to achieve certain >> functionality with their eval boards?! I guess you guys are taking the >> "device trees are used to describe the hardware" statement to it's >> fullest extent. > > Well, I've always been a rebel. > > Honestly, I just thought it would be harmless and a lot easier (for me) > than trying to convince some documentation dude to write it up and publish > it. Heh. Well, it's up to Kumar what to do about this one upstream, it just seemed like a weird choice to document board reworks in the device tree comments. Having it somewhere that sticks to google's database is better than nothing at all, I suppose. :) -Olof