From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vs166246.vserver.de (vs166246.vserver.de [62.75.166.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FCCDDD01 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 03:10:00 +1100 (EST) From: Michael Buesch To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Do not fail build if mkimage is not available Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:08:51 +0100 References: <200712261655.56432.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200712261708.51432.mb@bu3sch.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: Andrew Morton , paulus@au.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday 26 December 2007 17:03:43 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Michael Buesch writes: > > > + set +e > > mkimage -A ppc -O linux -T kernel -C gzip -a 00000000 -e 00000000 \ > > $uboot_version -d "$vmz" "$ofile" > > + [ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 0 > > + set -e > > mkimage ... || exit 0 Could you PLEASE increase your verbosity? Why is mkimage || exit 0 any better than my test? -- Greetings Michael.