From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:26:52 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC Message-ID: <20080102002652.GA4655@localhost.localdomain> References: <11981089894052-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <9e4733910801010925j67192427o4e0e824b9d7e0ad0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <9e4733910801010925j67192427o4e0e824b9d7e0ad0@mail.gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:25:32PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > On 12/19/07, Timur Tabi wrote: > > + ssi@16000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,ssi"; > > + cell-index = <0>; > > + reg = <16000 100>; > > + interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; > > + interrupts = <3e 2>; > > + fsl,mode = "i2s-slave"; > > + codec { > > + compatible = "cirrus,cs4270"; > > + /* MCLK source is a stand-alone oscillator */ > > + bus-frequency = ; > > + }; > > + }; > > Does this need to be bus-frequency? It's always called MCLK in all of > the literature. > > In my case the MCLK comes from a chip on the i2c bus that is > programmable How would that be encoded?. Grah! If there's one obvious frequency for a node, it should always be "clock-frequency". This bus-frequency nonsense seems to be a disease that started as a secondary frequency in Freescale CPU nodes, and has escaped to all sorts of other places. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson