From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1CADDEE8 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:09:21 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:08:30 -0600 From: Scott Wood To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC Message-ID: <20080102180830.GC4398@loki.buserror.net> References: <11981089894052-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20071220040633.GA6732@lixom.net> <476A7B23.2040905@freescale.com> <20071220223943.GA24138@lixom.net> <476AEEB3.2010403@freescale.com> <476AF015.5040600@freescale.com> <476DCECD.6040008@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <476DCECD.6040008@freescale.com> Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 08:58:21PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: > >>> None of the SOC nodes in any DTS have a "compatible" entry. >> >> Not quite true; ep88xc, mpc8272ads, and pq2fads have them. > > Ah ok. So what should the compatible entry for 8641 be? > > compatible = "fsl,mpc8641" Yes. > That looks a lot like what a compatible entry for the CPU should be. I guess technically the cpu should list something like fsl,e600 (or whatever suffix is relevant). -Scott