From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:46:40 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: "Mark A. Greer" Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: #address-cells & #size-cells properties not inherited Message-ID: <20080102194640.48c97d0c@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20080103000750.GA22035@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <20080103000750.GA22035@mag.az.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:07:50 -0700 "Mark A. Greer" wrote: > From: Mark A. Greer > > Fix error in booting-without-of.txt that indicates that a node can inherit > its #address-cells and #size-cells definitions from its parent's parent. > This is not correct and the latest dtc enforces it. I'm lazy so I haven't checked myself, but by "latest dtc" does that mean the DTC that's in the kernel now? Things are going to be fun when we start saying generic things like "latest DTC". And when upstream DTC gets new features or enforcements, we'll have to have all the in-kernel DTS files patched up when that version of DTC gets merged in-kernel. Just something to keep in mind as we move along. josh