From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:23:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080103072334.GA16176@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102221228.C9D8D26F9A0@magilla.localdomain>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing
> precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the
> HAVE_ prefix than those using it.
The convention is newly established - so no suprise.
> The patch versions I've sent now work
> fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow
> the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would
> be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches
> for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups.
Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger..
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-03 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071223183920.GA13976@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20071223211603.3FFB126F8E7@magilla.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20071230163614.GB1384@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20080102044157.A5CC526F99F@magilla.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20080102111431.GD14731@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20080102191030.GA11217@uranus.ravnborg.org>
2008-01-02 21:08 ` [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:12 ` [PATCH -mm] x86 compat_binfmt_elf, " Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:58 ` [PATCH -mm] x86 compat_binfmt_elf Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 21:17 ` [PATCH -mm] powerpc compat_binfmt_elf Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:53 ` [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 21:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 22:12 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-03 7:23 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-01-02 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080103072334.GA16176@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).