From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Manish Ahuja <ahuja@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: mahuja@us.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linasvepstas@gmail.com, lkessler@us.ibm.com, strosake@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] pseries: phyp dump: Docmentation
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:29:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109042911.GT14201@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4782C026.8080302@austin.ibm.com>
Manish Ahuja wrote:
> +
> + Hypervisor-Assisted Dump
> + ------------------------
> + November 2007
Date is unneeded (and, uhm, dated :)
> +The goal of hypervisor-assisted dump is to enable the dump of
> +a crashed system, and to do so from a fully-reset system, and
> +to minimize the total elapsed time until the system is back
> +in production use.
Is it actually faster than kdump?
> +As compared to kdump or other strategies, hypervisor-assisted
> +dump offers several strong, practical advantages:
> +
> +-- Unlike kdump, the system has been reset, and loaded
> + with a fresh copy of the kernel. In particular,
> + PCI and I/O devices have been reinitialized and are
> + in a clean, consistent state.
> +-- As the dump is performed, the dumped memory becomes
> + immediately available to the system for normal use.
> +-- After the dump is completed, no further reboots are
> + required; the system will be fully usable, and running
> + in it's normal, production mode on it normal kernel.
> +
> +The above can only be accomplished by coordination with,
> +and assistance from the hypervisor. The procedure is
> +as follows:
> +
> +-- When a system crashes, the hypervisor will save
> + the low 256MB of RAM to a previously registered
> + save region. It will also save system state, system
> + registers, and hardware PTE's.
> +
> +-- After the low 256MB area has been saved, the
> + hypervisor will reset PCI and other hardware state.
> + It will *not* clear RAM. It will then launch the
> + bootloader, as normal.
> +
> +-- The freshly booted kernel will notice that there
> + is a new node (ibm,dump-kernel) in the device tree,
> + indicating that there is crash data available from
> + a previous boot. It will boot into only 256MB of RAM,
> + reserving the rest of system memory.
> +
> +-- Userspace tools will parse /sys/kernel/release_region
> + and read /proc/vmcore to obtain the contents of memory,
> + which holds the previous crashed kernel. The userspace
> + tools may copy this info to disk, or network, nas, san,
> + iscsi, etc. as desired.
> +
> + For Example: the values in /sys/kernel/release-region
> + would look something like this (address-range pairs).
> + CPU:0x177fee000-0x10000: HPTE:0x177ffe020-0x1000: /
> + DUMP:0x177fff020-0x10000000, 0x10000000-0x16F1D370A
> +
> +-- As the userspace tools complete saving a portion of
> + dump, they echo an offset and size to
> + /sys/kernel/release_region to release the reserved
> + memory back to general use.
> +
> + An example of this is:
> + "echo 0x40000000 0x10000000 > /sys/kernel/release_region"
> + which will release 256MB at the 1GB boundary.
This violates the "one file, one value" rule of sysfs, but nobody
really takes that seriously, I guess. In any case, consider
documenting this in Documentation/ABI.
> +
> +Please note that the hypervisor-assisted dump feature
> +is only available on Power6-based systems with recent
> +firmware versions.
This statement will of course become dated/incorrect so I recommend
removing it.
> +
> +Implementation details:
> +----------------------
> +In order for this scheme to work, memory needs to be reserved
> +quite early in the boot cycle. However, access to the device
> +tree this early in the boot cycle is difficult, and device-tree
> +access is needed to determine if there is a crash data waiting.
I don't think this bit about early device tree access is correct. By
the time your code is reserving memory (from early_init_devtree(), I
think), RTAS has been instantiated and you are able to test for the
existence of /rtas/ibm,dump-kernel.
> +To work around this problem, all but 256MB of RAM is reserved
> +during early boot. A short while later in boot, a check is made
> +to determine if there is dump data waiting. If there isn't,
> +then the reserved memory is released to general kernel use.
So I think these gymnastics are unneeded -- unless I'm
misunderstanding something, you should be able to determine very early
whether to reserve that memory.
> +If there is dump data, then the /sys/kernel/release_region
> +file is created, and the reserved memory is held.
> +
> +If there is no waiting dump data, then all but 256MB of the
> +reserved ram will be released for general kernel use. The
> +highest 256 MB of RAM will *not* be released: this region
> +will be kept permanently reserved, so that it can act as
> +a receptacle for a copy of the low 256MB in the case a crash
> +does occur. See, however, "open issues" below, as to whether
> +such a reserved region is really needed.
> +
> +Currently the dump will be copied from /proc/vmcore to a
> +a new file upon user intervention. The starting address
> +to be read and the range for each data point in provided
^is
> +in /sys/kernel/release_region.
> +
> +The tools to examine the dump will be same as the ones
> +used for kdump.
> +
> +
> +General notes:
> +--------------
> +Security: please note that there are potential security issues
> +with any sort of dump mechanism. In particular, plaintext
> +(unencrypted) data, and possibly passwords, may be present in
> +the dump data. Userspace tools must take adequate precautions to
> +preserve security.
> +
> +Open issues/ToDo:
> +------------
> + o The various code paths that tell the hypervisor that a crash
> + occurred, vs. it simply being a normal reboot, should be
> + reviewed, and possibly clarified/fixed.
> +
> + o Instead of using /sys/kernel, should there be a /sys/dump
> + instead? There is a dump_subsys being created by the s390 code,
> + perhaps the pseries code should use a similar layout as well.
Well, it seems to me that there's little reason to duplicate the s390
layout unless we can actually share code.
FWIW, I've been thinking about making a /sys/firmware/phyp hierarchy
which could contain much of the System P-specific functions (DLPAR,
lparcfg, other crud in /proc/ppc64)... seems suited to this
platform-specific dump mechanism.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-07 23:45 [PATCH 0/8] pseries: phyp dump: hypervisor-assisted dump Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 0:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] pseries: phyp dump: Docmentation Manish Ahuja
2008-01-09 4:29 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2008-01-09 4:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-01-09 15:31 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-09 18:44 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-01-09 19:28 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-01-09 22:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-01-09 23:18 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-01-10 2:47 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-10 3:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-01-10 2:33 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-10 3:17 ` Olof Johansson
2008-01-10 4:12 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-10 4:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-01-10 16:21 ` Olof Johansson
2008-01-10 16:34 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-10 21:46 ` Mike Strosaker
2008-01-11 1:26 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-01-11 16:57 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-14 5:24 ` Olof Johansson
2008-01-14 15:21 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-08 0:16 ` [PATCH 2/8] pseries: phyp dump: config file Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-01-08 0:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] pseries: phyp dump: use sysfs to release reserved mem Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-01-08 18:34 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-01-08 0:25 ` [PATCH 3/8] pseries: phyp dump: reserve-release proof-of-concept Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 3:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-01-16 4:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-01-08 0:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] pseries: phyp dump: register dump area Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 3:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-01-08 0:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] pseries: phyp dump: debugging print routines Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 0:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-01-08 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-01-08 0:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] pseries: phyp dump: Unregister and print dump areas Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 4:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-01-08 22:56 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-01-08 0:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] pseries: phyp dump: Tracking memory range freed Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 6:31 ` [PATCH 0/8] pseries: phyp dump: hypervisor-assisted dump Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] pseries: phyp dump: Docmentation Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 7:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] pseries: phyp dump: reserve-release proof-of-concept Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 8:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-12 16:38 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-14 3:46 ` Tony Breeds
2008-02-14 23:12 ` Olof Johansson
2008-02-15 7:16 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 7:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] pseries: phyp dump: use sysfs to release reserved mem Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 10:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-12 16:40 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-15 1:05 ` Tony Breeds
2008-02-15 7:17 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-15 22:32 ` Tony Breeds
2008-02-15 17:30 ` Linas Vepstas
2008-02-12 7:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] pseries: phyp dump: register dump area Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 10:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-12 16:31 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 7:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] pseries: phyp dump: debugging print routines Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 7:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] pseries: phyp dump: Invalidate and print dump areas Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 10:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-12 16:32 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-13 21:43 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 7:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] pseries: phyp dump: Tracking memory range freed Manish Ahuja
2008-02-12 7:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] pseries: phyp dump: config file Manish Ahuja
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-22 19:12 [PATCH 0/8] pseries: phyp dump: hypervisor-assisted dump Manish Ahuja
2008-01-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] pseries: phyp dump: Docmentation Manish Ahuja
2008-02-18 4:53 [PATCH 0/8] pseries: phyp dump: hypervisor-assisted dump Manish Ahuja
2008-02-22 0:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-28 23:57 ` Manish Ahuja
2008-02-29 0:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] pseries: phyp dump: Docmentation Manish Ahuja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080109042911.GT14201@localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=ahuja@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkessler@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mahuja@us.ibm.com \
--cc=strosake@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).