From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E2EDE04A for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:54:08 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comm-neu.esd (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513AC108102 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:53:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from comm-neu.esd ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (comm [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29034-02 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:53:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from debby.esd (debby.esd [10.0.0.190]) by comm-neu.esd (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2205C10804A for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:53:29 +0100 (CET) From: Matthias Fuchs To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: PCI interrupt assignment on sequoia board Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:53:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200801091653.22478.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I noticed that Josh's 'for-2.5.25' does not assign PCI interrupts correctly: bash-3.00# lspci -v 00:00.0 Class 0680: 1014:027f Subsystem: 10e8:cafe Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16 Memory at (32-bit, prefetchable) Capabilities: [58] Power Management version 2 00:0a.0 Class 0b20: 1014:027f (this is a PPC440EPx PCI target board in a sequoia PCI slot) Subsystem: 12fe:0441 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 16 Memory at 0000000180000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] Memory at 0000000184000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16M] Capabilities: [58] Power Management version 2 00:0c.0 Class 0200: 168c:0013 (rev 01) Subsystem: 14b7:0a60 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 16 Memory at 0000000185000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2 bash-3.00# uname -a Linux sequoia 2.6.24-rc6-g78994e24 #5 Wed Jan 9 16:22:31 CET 2008 ppc ppc ppc GNU/Linux All interrupts are '16'. But I expected 67 as correctly stated in the device tree. This test has been made with the uboot wrapper code. Any idea? Matthias