From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outbound9-sin-R.bigfish.com (outbound-sin.frontbridge.com [207.46.51.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.bigfish.com", Issuer "*.bigfish.com" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB48DE025 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:27:51 +1100 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Subject: RE: In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and ML403? Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:27:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: <147365.85546.qm@web92009.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> References: <147365.85546.qm@web92009.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> From: "Stephen Neuendorffer" To: "diak sim" , Message-Id: <20080110212749.3A4D312A804E@mail170-sin.bigfish.com> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , There shouldn't be a significant different in the cores themselves, = however, there are many ways to get the FPGA design slightly wrong where = it won't boot, or to get the kernel xparameters file out of synch with = the FPGA design. This is most likely your problem. Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+stephen=3Dneuendorffer.name@ozlabs.org = [mailto:linuxppc-embedded- > bounces+stephen=3Dneuendorffer.name@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of diak sim > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 5:56 AM > To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: In PowerPC's feature,are there any difference between ML410 = and ML403? >=20 > Hello everyone, >=20 > I am using ML410 to port a Linux 2.6 kernel, but init_IRQ() doesn't = pass. > Porting Linux 2.6 to ML403 is successful? No such a problem? > In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and = ML403? >=20 > Thanks. >=20 >=20 > ________________________________ >=20 > = =D1=C5=BB=A2=D3=CA=CF=E4=B4=AB=B5=DD=D0=C2=C4=EA=D7=A3=B8=A3=A3=AC=B8=F6=D0= =D4=BA=D8=BF=A8=CB=CD=C7=D7=C5=F3=A3=A1 =