From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ECDDDEEB for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:07:32 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:07:23 -0600 From: Scott Wood To: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: PPC vs POWERPC Message-ID: <20080115170723.GA10988@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <23145.147.11.3.128.1200054808.squirrel@www.sundmangroup.com> <478C8D38.3090602@sundmangroup.com> <1200416484.14540.5.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1200416484.14540.5.camel@ld0161-tx32> Cc: Matias Sundman , "linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:01:33AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > If it is the former group, 824x, perhaps some of the parts > in embedded6xx/ are usable? Not all 824x fall into that category; for example, 8248 is pq2. Someone in marketing should be shot. -Scott