From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-107-backup.nerim.net [62.4.16.107]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D08DDE04 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:35:01 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:34:57 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Rudolf Marek Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/3] i2c: Use the standard, alias-based device/driver matching scheme Message-ID: <20080121133457.4438a494@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <479478C7.5060807@assembler.cz> References: <20080121112517.6fe35a89@hyperion.delvare> <479478C7.5060807@assembler.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Brownell , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linux I2C List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:49:43 +0100, Rudolf Marek wrote: > > Note: all the arm and powerpc stuff is untested. > > We at http://sysgo.com have some demo server, where you can access embedded > systems remotely (via VNC to a server with cross tools (ELinOS) + serial console), > there is 2.6.22 kernel, but I think the i2c core can be replaced. I think some > PPC and ARMs are connected there. I will ask if you can get access to it if you > are interested. Thanks for the proposal, but in general I think it makes more sense that people who are familiar with these architectures test the patches themselves. That's less work for me, and they'll do a better job anyway. -- Jean Delvare