From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e36.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFBBDDE9E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:23:39 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MJNZTV015941 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:23:35 -0500 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m0MJNZFF031036 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:23:35 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0MJNYY2017591 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:23:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:23:33 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: Joshua Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various new ibm405 DCRN #defines Message-ID: <20080122132333.07cc28fb@weaponx> In-Reply-To: <479640BB.8020704@qlogic.com> References: <47952018.7050702@qlogic.com> <1200956274.6807.12.camel@pasglop> <47962316.8040709@qlogic.com> <20080122111038.1072dac4@weaponx> <479640BB.8020704@qlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:15:07 -0600 Joshua Williams wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:08:38 -0600 > > Joshua Williams wrote: > > > >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 16:43 -0600, Joshua Williams wrote: > >>>> Various new ibm405 DCRN #defines. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Williams > >>> May I ask what for ? :-) Also, it's all arch/ppc, not arch/powerpc... > >>> nothing we want to improve to much on at this stage unless there's a > >>> really good reason. > >> The 405x #defines were incomplete and this was meant to > >> make them a bit tighter. Since arch/ppc is in life support > >> mode this can wait until the 405x stuff gets moved over to > >> arch/powerpc. > > > > Which 405x stuff? Walnut is moved over already. Other boards will > > need to be ported by people that have those boards. > > Gotcha. I'll revisit this once everything has been moved over. Sorry, maybe Ben and I aren't being clear. 405GP (Walnut) support is in arch/powerpc. There is also support for 405EX and 405EXr. The arch/ppc tree is going to die in June, whether the rest of the 405 boards are ported or not. So are you trying to add defines for a new board, or? I don't see much of a reason not to go ahead and do what you're doing now rather than later but I'll leave that up to you :) josh