From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com (ra.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B81DDE0E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:01:48 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:12:39 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Masakazu Mokuno Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PS3: gelic: gelic updates for 2.6.25 Message-ID: <20080122211239.GC3206@tuxdriver.com> References: <20071213181146.BF69.MOKUNO@sm.sony.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20071213181146.BF69.MOKUNO@sm.sony.co.jp> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux/PPC Development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:38:28PM +0900, Masakazu Mokuno wrote: > Here is a set of updates for PS3 gelic network driver. > This patch set requires other patches which were already submitted by > Geert (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119626095605487). > > [1] PS3: gelic: Fix the wrong dev_id passed > [2] PS3: gelic: Add endianness macros > [3] PS3: gelic: Code cleanup > [4] PS3: gelic: Remove duplicated ethtool handers > [5] PS3: gelic: Add support for port link status > [6] PS3: gelic: Add support for dual network interface > > This is also a set of prerequisite for new wireless driver for PS3, which > I'll submit later. These seem to not have been applied, but I couldn't find any stated reason. Did they just get lost? Withdrawn? Will these be applied? There is a wireless patch that depends on them. If not, will the wireless portion be refactored to not require these patches? Thanks, John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com