From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129DFDDDF2 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:20:42 +1100 (EST) To: Juergen Beisert From: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [MPC5200] problem running FEC and ATA Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:28:22 +0100." <200801211728.22817.jbe@pengutronix.de> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:20:40 +0100 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20080123002040.5049F24781@gemini.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Mehlan, Markus \(Ritter Elektronik\)" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <200801211728.22817.jbe@pengutronix.de> you wrote: > > Is anybody out there with more MPC5200B experience? Can someone tell me why > some MPC5200B are need this patch and others not? We have two different > systems here (cards from different vendors) with the same processor, one > needs this BSDIS-patch and the other not. ??????????????? Is it really exactly the same CPU revision? My guess is that one is rev. B and the other one is older... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de It would be illogical to assume that all conditions remain stable -- Spock, "The Enterprise" Incident", stardate 5027.3