From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.extern.pengutronix.de (metis.extern.pengutronix.de [83.236.181.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4AADDE00 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:03:27 +1100 (EST) From: Juergen Beisert To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:03:14 +0100 References: <20080123002040.5049F24781@gemini.denx.de> In-Reply-To: <20080123002040.5049F24781@gemini.denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200801231003.15045.jbe@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [MPC5200] problem running FEC and ATA Cc: "Mehlan, Markus \(Ritter Elektronik\)" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Wolfgang, On Wednesday 23 January 2008 01:20, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <200801211728.22817.jbe@pengutronix.de> you wrote: > > Is anybody out there with more MPC5200B experience? Can someone tell me > > why some MPC5200B are need this patch and others not? We have two > > different systems here (cards from different vendors) with the same > > processor, one needs this BSDIS-patch and the other not. ??????????????? > > Is it really exactly the same CPU revision? My guess is that one is > rev. B and the other one is older... The one who needs this patch (CPU card vendor 1): MPC5200CVR400B, M62C REV 1, QCW0723T The CPUs who do not need this patch (CPU card vendor 2): SPC5200CBV400B, M62C REV 1, QAG0610C MPC5200CVR400B, M62C REV 1, QAJ0613F Best regards Juergen Beisert =2D-=20 Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Beisert | http://www.pengutronix.de =A0Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry =A0 Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 =A0 =A0 =A0 Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany Phone: +49-8766-939 228 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9