linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	"Kernel, Linux" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] [POWERPC] 8xx cleanups
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123180012.GA23313@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47977A02.40506@freescale.com>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:31:46AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
> >
> >Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
> >We have:
> >arch/ppc
> >arch/ppc64
> >arch/powerpc
> >
> >It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed
> >to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it
> >does not even provide a defconfig.
> >
> >And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe
> >because I looked at a wrong place.
> 
> You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
> 
> arch/ppc is scheduled for removal from mainline in June.
Good to hear.

> arch/powerpc is under significant development, with lots
> of defconfigs in arch/powerpc/configs.
Double checked - it was my build script that used ARCH=ppc
Now I just need to build another toolchain as the ppc750 could not build
the defconfig. crosstool is my friend here.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-23 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-23 15:58 [PATCHv2 0/8] [POWERPC] 8xx cleanups Jochen Friedrich
2008-01-23 16:11 ` Kumar Gala
2008-01-23 17:12   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-23 17:31     ` Jon Loeliger
2008-01-23 18:00       ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-01-23 19:35         ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-23 20:12           ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080123180012.GA23313@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=jdl@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).