From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pasmtpA.tele.dk (pasmtpa.tele.dk [80.160.77.114]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697EEDDECF for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:00:05 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] [POWERPC] 8xx cleanups Message-ID: <20080123180012.GA23313@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <4797641F.4000902@scram.de> <20080123171252.GA22967@uranus.ravnborg.org> <47977A02.40506@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <47977A02.40506@freescale.com> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev list , "Kernel, Linux" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:31:46AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >>What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build? > > > >Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc? > >We have: > >arch/ppc > >arch/ppc64 > >arch/powerpc > > > >It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed > >to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it > >does not even provide a defconfig. > > > >And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe > >because I looked at a wrong place. > > You must have looked in the wrong place. :-) > > arch/ppc is scheduled for removal from mainline in June. Good to hear. > arch/powerpc is under significant development, with lots > of defconfigs in arch/powerpc/configs. Double checked - it was my build script that used ARCH=ppc Now I just need to build another toolchain as the ppc750 could not build the defconfig. crosstool is my friend here. Sam