From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E46DDDFA for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:29:17 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:29:01 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] MPC8360E-RDK: device tree, board file and defconfig Message-ID: <20080124132900.GA25982@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080123204507.GA12973@localhost.localdomain> <20080124132201.c3086756.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 In-Reply-To: <20080124132201.c3086756.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:22:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:45:07 +0300 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc836x_rdk.c > > +static int __init mpc836x_rdk_declare_of_platform_devices(void) > > +{ > > + const struct of_device_id mpc836x_rdk_ids[] = { > > Please change this to static, __initdata and not const, thanks. These > arrays are usually defined outside a function, but that is not really a > problem. Pity... we don't need these _ids anywhere outside that function. But looking into objdump output I see the problem now. Will change this back, thanks. > > +static void __init mpc836x_rdk_setup_arch(void) > > +{ > > + struct device_node *np; > > !defined(CONFIG_PCI) && !defined(CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE) will produce a > warning here. Good catch, thanks. > > + if (ppc_md.progress) > > + ppc_md.progress("mpc836x_rdk_setup_arch()", 0); > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI > > + for_each_compatible_node(np, "pci", "fsl,mpc8349-pci") > > + mpc83xx_add_bridge(np); > > +#endif > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE > > + qe_reset(); > > + > > + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,qe-pario"); > > + if (!np) { > > + pr_warning("QE PIO not initialized!\n"); > > + return; > > You need an of_node_put(np) before the return. Hm, really? I think I don't. But if you insist... :-) -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2