From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Kernel oops while duming user core.
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:41:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131204158.GV14201@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080131201601.GA10501@loki.buserror.net>
Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:40:04AM -0600, Rune Torgersen wrote:
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x48024000
> > Faulting instruction address: 0xc000f0a0
> > Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> > PREEMPT Innovative Systems ApMax
>
> Does it happen without preempt?
>
> > Modules linked in: drv_wd(P) drv_scc devcom drv_pcir tipc drv_ss7
> > drv_auxcpu drv_leds(P) drv_ethsw proc_sysinfo(P) i2c_8266(P)
> > NIP: c000f0a0 LR: c0011fec CTR: 00000080
> > REGS: eebe9b70 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: P (2.6.24-test)
>
> Does it happen without the modules?
I doubt the modules are the problem; there was a practically identical
report from someone with an untainted 2.6.24-rc kernel a few weeks ago
(see my first reply to Rune).
>
> > MSR: 00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 24004442 XER: 00000000
> > DAR: 48024000, DSISR: 20000000
>
> Hmm, this doesn't look like a valid DSISR, so I'm guessing this was a TLB
> miss that got redirected to DataAccess (or is there something that causes
> DSRISR[2] to be set on 8280? I didn't see anything in the manual...).
> However, SRR1 in that case seems to indicate a store, which dcbst shouldn't
> generate (except on 8xx, according to the comment in update_mmu_cache).
>
> Do you have a simple test case that we could try to reproduce? I tried a
> simple core dump on an 8280, and it worked.
Is the crashing program multithreaded? The first report had firefox
triggering the oops.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-31 13:45 Kernel oops while duming user core Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 16:15 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-01-31 16:26 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 17:40 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 19:15 ` Kumar Gala
2008-01-31 19:18 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 20:16 ` Scott Wood
2008-01-31 20:19 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 20:38 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 20:41 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2008-01-31 20:45 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 20:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-01-31 21:58 ` Scott Wood
2008-01-31 22:10 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-02-03 7:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-04 18:23 ` Kernel oops while dumping " Scott Wood
2008-01-31 19:15 ` Kernel oops while duming " Kumar Gala
2008-01-31 19:23 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-31 19:54 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-02-01 17:38 ` Scott Wood
2008-02-02 12:05 ` Clemens Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080131204158.GV14201@localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).