[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: mpc83xx_defconfig: enable math emulation and ucc_geth

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: mpc83xx_defconfig: enable math emulation and ucc_geth

[Kim Phillips]

and some PHYs mpc83xx boards use.

Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig |   10 +++++-----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig
index 31bdbf3..a9807f0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
 CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y
 # CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC is not set
-# CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set
+CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION=y
 CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y
 CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y
 CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y
@@ -416,14 +416,14 @@ CONFIG_PHYLIB=y
 # MII PHY device drivers
 #
 CONFIG_MARVELL_PHY=y
-# CONFIG_DAVICOM_PHY is not set
+CONFIG_DAVICOM_PHY=y
 # CONFIG_QSEMI_PHY is not set
 # CONFIG_LXT_PHY is not set
 # CONFIG_CICADA_PHY is not set
-# CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY is not set
+CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY=y
 # CONFIG_SMSC_PHY is not set
 # CONFIG_BROADCOM_PHY is not set
-# CONFIG_ICPLUS_PHY is not set
+CONFIG_ICPLUS_PHY=y
 # CONFIG_FIXED_PHY is not set
 # CONFIG_MDIO_BITBANG is not set
 CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ CONFIG_MII=y
 CONFIG_NETDEV_1000=y
 CONFIG_GIANFAR=y
 # CONFIG_GFAR_NAPI is not set
-# CONFIG_UCC_GETH is not set
+CONFIG_UCC_GETH=y
 CONFIG_NETDEV_10000=y
 
 #
-- 
1.5.2.2

[PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Yuri Tikhonov]

 Hello,

 Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate correctly on
the ppc-8xx-based machines.

Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
--
diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index eb8d26f..321bda2 100644
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -329,8 +329,18 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* ....and get the pte address */
 	lwz	r10, 0(r11)	/* Get the pte */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
+	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
+	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
+	beq	4f
+	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
+	stw	r10, 0(r11)
+4:
+#else
 	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
 	stw	r10, 0(r11)
+#endif
 
 	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
 	 * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
@@ -395,8 +405,17 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
 
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
+	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
+	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
+	beq	4f
+	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
+4:
+	/* and update pte in table */
+#else
 	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
+#endif
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
 	stw	r10, 0(r11)
 
 	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
@@ -575,7 +594,16 @@ DataTLBError:
 
 	/* Update 'changed', among others.
 	*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
+	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_HWWRITE
+	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
+	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
+	beq	4f
+	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
+4:
+#else
 	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_HWWRITE
+#endif
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC		/* Get pte address again */
 	stw	r10, 0(r11)		/* and update pte in table */
 
diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
index c159315..76717ff 100644
--- a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
@@ -341,14 +341,6 @@ extern unsigned long ioremap_bot, ioremap_base;
 #define _PMD_PAGE_MASK	0x000c
 #define _PMD_PAGE_8M	0x000c
 
-/*
- * The 8xx TLB miss handler allegedly sets _PAGE_ACCESSED in the PTE
- * for an address even if _PAGE_PRESENT is not set, as a performance
- * optimization.  This is a bug if you ever want to use swap unless
- * _PAGE_ACCESSED is 2, which it isn't, or unless you have 8xx-specific
- * definitions for __swp_entry etc. below, which would be gross.
- *  -- paulus
- */
 #define _PTE_NONE_MASK _PAGE_ACCESSED
 
 #else /* CONFIG_6xx */

-- 
Yuri Tikhonov, Senior Software Engineer
Emcraft Systems, www.emcraft.com

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Jochen Friedrich]

Hi Yuri,

>  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate correctly on
> the ppc-8xx-based machines.

is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?

Thanks,
Jochen 

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Yuri Tikhonov]

 Hi Jochen,

 The board for which this fix was developed is one of these (ivms8). Here are 
some other: rpxlite, TQM860L, rpxcllf, bseip, FADS, and etc...

  Just do grep -r "CONFIG_8xx=y" arch/ppc/configs/ and grep -r "CONFIG_8xx=y" 
arch/powerpc/configs/ :)

 Regards, Yuri

On Saturday 02 February 2008 14:22, you wrote:
...
> >  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate correctly 
on
> > the ppc-8xx-based machines.
> 
> is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jochen 
> 

-- 
Yuri Tikhonov, Senior Software Engineer
Emcraft Systems, www.emcraft.com

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Scott Wood]

On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Yuri,
> 
> >  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate correctly on
> > the ppc-8xx-based machines.
> 
> is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?

More importantly, is this something that is also broken in arch/powerpc?  It
looks like it has the same code...

-Scott

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Vitaly Bordug]

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:24:21 -0600
Scott Wood wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > Hi Yuri,
> > 
> > >  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate
> > > correctly on the ppc-8xx-based machines.
> > 
> > is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?
> 
> More importantly, is this something that is also broken in
> arch/powerpc?  It looks like it has the same code...
> 
yes, it is. Though there is currently no best-at-all solution, this looks worth trying.
I'll have a look how the 8xx feels under load and report back.

-- 
Sincerely, Vitaly

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Vitaly,

in message <20080205013857.47ebe544@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:24:21 -0600
> Scott Wood wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > Hi Yuri,
> > > 
> > > >  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate
> > > > correctly on the ppc-8xx-based machines.
> > > 
> > > is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?
> > 
> > More importantly, is this something that is also broken in
> > arch/powerpc?  It looks like it has the same code...
> > 
> yes, it is. Though there is currently no best-at-all solution, this looks worth trying.
> I'll have a look how the 8xx feels under load and report back.

Have you been able to check if arch/powerpc needs similar fixing?


Also, what is the current state of this patch? I would like to avoid
that it get's lost completeley.


BenH commented on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:37:07 +1100:

> Best is to just remove writeback completely and let the generic
> code handle it.

Has this been considered / tested by anybody?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Man did not weave the web of life; he  is  merely  a  strand  in  it.
Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.     - Seattle [1854]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Vitaly Bordug]

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:21:58 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> Dear Vitaly,
> 
> in message <20080205013857.47ebe544@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:24:21 -0600
> > Scott Wood wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > > Hi Yuri,
> > > > 
> > > > >  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate
> > > > > correctly on the ppc-8xx-based machines.
> > > > 
> > > > is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?
> > > 
> > > More importantly, is this something that is also broken in
> > > arch/powerpc?  It looks like it has the same code...
> > > 
> > yes, it is. Though there is currently no best-at-all solution, this
> > looks worth trying. I'll have a look how the 8xx feels under load
> > and report back.
> 
> Have you been able to check if arch/powerpc needs similar fixing?
> 
> 
> Also, what is the current state of this patch? I would like to avoid
> that it get's lost completeley.
> 
I have revalidated it (version modded to fit powerpc) with pretty tight stressing and can conclude
this is good enough for mainline (it gets things much better than they are now, 
in  case of swap enabled).

I'll follow-up with relevant patch shortly.



> 
> BenH commented on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:37:07 +1100:
> 
> > Best is to just remove writeback completely and let the generic
> > code handle it.
> 
> Has this been considered / tested by anybody?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 


-- 
Sincerely, Vitaly

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Yuri Tikhonov]

 Hi Scott,

 You are right. The TLB handlers for 8xx in arch/powerpc branch set the 
PAGE_ACCESSED flag unconditionally too. And the 
include/asm-powerpc/pgtable-ppc32.h file still includes the comment that this 
is the bug. So, probably the corresponding patch for powerpc branch will be 
usefull. Does anybody use swap with some of the 8xx-based boards supported in 
powerpc branch ?

 Regards, Yuri

On Monday 04 February 2008 21:24, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > Hi Yuri,
> > 
> > >  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate correctly 
on
> > > the ppc-8xx-based machines.
> > 
> > is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc?
> 
> More importantly, is this something that is also broken in arch/powerpc?  It
> looks like it has the same code...
> 
> -Scott
> 

-- 
Yuri Tikhonov, Senior Software Engineer
Emcraft Systems, www.emcraft.com

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Jochen Friedrich]

Hi Yuri,

> Does anybody use swap with some of the 8xx-based boards supported in 
> powerpc branch ?

modded DBox2 boxes do. Unfortunately, i don't have such a modded box.
The tuxbox project currently uses a really ugly hack to support swapping:

http://git.bocc.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=dbox2.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9d6ed33d85933f3900718a118a0cc2b776f067

Thanks,
Jochen

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 10:47 +0300, Yuri Tikhonov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>  Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate correctly on
> the ppc-8xx-based machines.

Best is to just remove writeback completely and let the generic
code handle it.

Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
> --
> diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> index eb8d26f..321bda2 100644
> --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> @@ -329,8 +329,18 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
>  	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* ....and get the pte address */
>  	lwz	r10, 0(r11)	/* Get the pte */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> +	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
> +	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
> +	beq	4f
> +	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
> +	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
> +	stw	r10, 0(r11)
> +4:
> +#else
>  	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
>  	stw	r10, 0(r11)
> +#endif
>  
>  	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
>  	 * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
> @@ -395,8 +405,17 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
>  	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
>  	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
>  
> -	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> +	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
> +	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
> +	beq	4f
> +	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
> +4:
> +	/* and update pte in table */
> +#else
>  	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
> +#endif
> +	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
>  	stw	r10, 0(r11)
>  
>  	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
> @@ -575,7 +594,16 @@ DataTLBError:
>  
>  	/* Update 'changed', among others.
>  	*/
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> +	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_HWWRITE
> +	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
> +	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
> +	beq	4f
> +	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
> +4:
> +#else
>  	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_HWWRITE
> +#endif
>  	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC		/* Get pte address again */
>  	stw	r10, 0(r11)		/* and update pte in table */
>  
> diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
> index c159315..76717ff 100644
> --- a/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
> @@ -341,14 +341,6 @@ extern unsigned long ioremap_bot, ioremap_base;
>  #define _PMD_PAGE_MASK	0x000c
>  #define _PMD_PAGE_8M	0x000c
>  
> -/*
> - * The 8xx TLB miss handler allegedly sets _PAGE_ACCESSED in the PTE
> - * for an address even if _PAGE_PRESENT is not set, as a performance
> - * optimization.  This is a bug if you ever want to use swap unless
> - * _PAGE_ACCESSED is 2, which it isn't, or unless you have 8xx-specific
> - * definitions for __swp_entry etc. below, which would be gross.
> - *  -- paulus
> - */
>  #define _PTE_NONE_MASK _PAGE_ACCESSED
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_6xx */
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix

[Kumar Gala]

On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:47 AM, Yuri Tikhonov wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate  
> correctly on
> the ppc-8xx-based machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>

applied.

- k