From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC575DDEC7 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:39:14 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:38:57 +0300 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PPC] 8xx swap bug-fix Message-ID: <20080205013857.47ebe544@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <20080204182421.GA3930@loki.buserror.net> References: <20080201181003.a3daf6ed.kim.phillips@freescale.com> <200802021047.32055.yur@emcraft.com> <47A45269.7080403@scram.de> <20080204182421.GA3930@loki.buserror.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul, Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:24:21 -0600 Scott Wood wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > Hi Yuri, > > > > > Here is the patch which makes Linux-2.6 swap routines operate > > > correctly on the ppc-8xx-based machines. > > > > is there any 8xx board left which isn't ported to ARCH=powerpc? > > More importantly, is this something that is also broken in > arch/powerpc? It looks like it has the same code... > yes, it is. Though there is currently no best-at-all solution, this looks worth trying. I'll have a look how the 8xx feels under load and report back. -- Sincerely, Vitaly