From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "e5.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK))
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48562DDE06
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:00:41 +1100 (EST)
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234])
	by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m17C0dnT019962
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:00:39 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id
	m17C0cE4231302
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:00:38 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
	m17C0cYd010780
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:00:38 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:00:12 -0600
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Imre Kaloz" <kaloz@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD support for the AMCC Taishan
Message-ID: <20080207060012.788e4258@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.t55gr5lb2s3iss@ecaz.afh.b-m.hu>
References: <120203530465-git-send-email-kaloz@openwrt.org>
	<op.t55gr5lb2s3iss@ecaz.afh.b-m.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:29:55 +0100
"Imre Kaloz" <kaloz@openwrt.org> wrote:

> *bump*? :) If anything is wrong with it, please let me know.

Nothing wrong that I could see.  I just need to test it first.

josh