From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:11:10 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Sean MacLennan Subject: Re: Could the DTS experts look at this? Message-ID: <20080211031110.GD11572@localhost.localdomain> References: <47ACE630.8090101@pikatech.com> <20080211001451.GA11572@localhost.localdomain> <47AFB593.30805@pikatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <47AFB593.30805@pikatech.com> Cc: LinuxPPC-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > This doesn't seem right. warp_fixup_one_nor() changes only the > > partition's offset, so you're not changing the size of any > > partitions. If you're not going to actually use any of the extra > > flash space with 64M, I can't see why you'd bother moving around the > > partitions you have. > > > u-boot must be at the bottom of the flash. Also, for the 64M NOR flash > you can put everything in the NOR flash, I just don't show the > partitions. Booting from NOR is *much* faster than booting from > NAND. Sorry, still not really following what's going on. Without worrying about the dts formatting or fixup code, can you summarise what the two flash maps look like? -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson