From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: Could the DTS experts look at this?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:50:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080212235058.GF21230@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B22E98.8040900@freescale.com>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:41:12PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I'm entirely happy about storing the fragments under a
> > special node - but certainly u-boot could do that if it wants. What
> > would certainly be ok is to store various fragments as separate blobs
> > and fold them together as necessary. Which reminds me, I meant to
> > implement a "graft" function in libfdt.
>
> Most likely, U-Boot would strip out the special node after
> processing it. The idea is for the boot loader to customize the
> device tree based before sending it to the kernel.
Of course. U-boot can use whatever representation it likes
internally, as long as it's all fixed up by the time it reaches the
kernel. I just think using sepa`rate "device tree fragment" blobs
might be a better way of doing it.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-08 23:30 Could the DTS experts look at this? Sean MacLennan
2008-02-10 5:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-10 6:05 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-02-11 17:57 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-11 23:54 ` David Gibson
2008-02-11 23:56 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 0:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-12 0:36 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 18:51 ` Scott Wood
2008-02-12 23:17 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 23:41 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-12 23:50 ` David Gibson [this message]
2008-02-12 15:44 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-12 18:58 ` Grant Likely
2008-02-12 19:08 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-12 19:34 ` Grant Likely
2008-02-12 19:45 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-12 20:43 ` Grant Likely
2008-02-12 23:35 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 23:50 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-13 0:10 ` Grant Likely
2008-02-12 23:26 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 23:47 ` Timur Tabi
2008-02-13 0:08 ` David Gibson
2008-02-13 0:15 ` Grant Likely
2008-02-12 23:21 ` David Gibson
2008-02-11 0:14 ` David Gibson
2008-02-11 2:40 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-02-11 3:11 ` David Gibson
2008-02-11 3:49 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-02-11 23:59 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 1:07 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-02-12 0:20 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 0:41 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-02-12 0:48 ` David Gibson
2008-02-12 18:52 ` Scott Wood
2008-02-12 19:03 ` Grant Likely
2008-02-12 19:10 ` Scott Wood
2008-02-17 10:22 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080212235058.GF21230@localhost.localdomain \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).