From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9252DDDEB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:30:50 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:31:25 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20080219.193125.04536962.davem@davemloft.net> To: galak@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][POWERPC] Fix initial lmb add region with a non-zero base From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4130F47E-4F4A-4911-B63B-403A8C423565@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20080219.163003.152862383.davem@davemloft.net> <4130F47E-4F4A-4911-B63B-403A8C423565@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Kumar Gala Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:02:04 -0600 > np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26? I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64 NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more smoothly.