From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from server196.onecontrol.com (ip-66-129-110-196.name-host.com [66.129.110.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48628DE0A9 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:42:00 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:12:47 -0500 To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org From: Steve Heflin Subject: Re: MODPOST section mismatches In-Reply-To: <20080221213313.97814DDF55@ozlabs.org> References: <20080221213313.97814DDF55@ozlabs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <20080222164210.48628DE0A9@ozlabs.org> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To reproduce the problem and see the details on section mismatches: make ARCH=powerpc sequoia_defconfig make ARCH=powerpc CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y At 04:33 PM 2/21/2008, Steve Heflin wrote: >while building vmlinux.o the MODPOST warns about 8 section mismatches. >WARNING: modpost: Found 8 section mismatch(es). >To see full details build your kernel with: >'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' > >After modifying the make launch to include the recommended option >shown above, I see that the section mismatch warning is due to data >structures containing the address of initialization modules which >have the __init attribute. Since the memory model is FLAT, is this a problem? > >thanks, >Steve > > > >_______________________________________________ >Linuxppc-embedded mailing list >Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org >https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded