From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from server196.onecontrol.com (ip-66-129-110-196.name-host.com [66.129.110.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FDBDDE45 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:07:22 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:07:37 -0500 To: Josh Boyer From: Steve Heflin Subject: Re: MODPOST section mismatches In-Reply-To: <20080222163625.29433d12@weaponx> References: <20080221213313.97814DDF55@ozlabs.org> <20080222164210.48628DE0A9@ozlabs.org> <20080222145224.7349cf36@weaponx> <20080222222637.C82EADDF0F@ozlabs.org> <20080222163625.29433d12@weaponx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <20080222230722.B7FDBDDE45@ozlabs.org> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , At 05:36 PM 2/22/2008, you wrote: >On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:26:52 -0500 >Steve Heflin wrote: > > > FLAT_MEM is one of the configuration options: > > CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y > >That has to do with NUMA stuff. It really doesn't have much bearing on >the section warnings. ah, thanks for setting me straight. I thought it meant that everything existed in a flat address space and existed in memory at the same time, and therefore the different section warnings might not apply.