From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B8EDDDFC for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:44:47 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:45:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20080223.184526.229564579.davem@davemloft.net> To: jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][OF] Add of_device_is_disabled function From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080223185904.757c2884@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20080223155823.2c85d829@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20080223185904.757c2884@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Josh Boyer Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:04 -0600 > Dave, I'm not sure how applicable this all is to sparc. But for some > of the "newer" embedded ports that are coming into powerpc I can see it > being very useful. I think I've seen this property on sparc boxes too, I'm fine with whatever you guys come up with.