From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.macqel.be (mail.macqel.be [194.78.208.39]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78259DDE00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:17:08 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:17:07 +0100 From: Philippe De Muyter To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: MPC8540 : What's "SPE used in kernel" ? Message-ID: <20080223101707.GA7194@10.1.86.20> References: <20080221123534.GA17716@ingate.macqel> <20080222095022.GA635@ingate.macqel> <08A7CD2B-27EA-4C97-9220-314E36BBBAA6@freescale.com> <20080223092458.GA6873@10.1.86.20> <1203760269.13162.11.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1203760269.13162.11.camel@johannes.berg> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Johanness, On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:51:08AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > My first trial used ARCH=ppc and caused this infinity of "SPE used in kernel" > > messages, but I then recompiled linux with ARCH=powerpc. With the message > > not ifdef'ed out, this second kernel does not emit "SPE used in kernel" > > messages, > > If I were to venture a guess I'd point to the fact that the arch/powerpc > Makefile contains > > # No SPE instruction when building kernel > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-spe) OK, that's a good point. But as I said in the same mail, processes still dies unexpectedly. > > while the arch/ppc one doesn't. > > johannes Philippe