linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: jyoung5@us.ibm.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [dtc] breaking out libfdt from dtc so other progs can use it
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:31:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080227143101.7a262aae@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1204141243.18831.12.camel@thinkpad.austin.ibm.com>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:40:43 -0600
Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
> have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone
> (linux kernel, cuboot) also have their own versions over libfdt. But if
> another userspace app wants to use libfdt , it has to copy it from the
> dtc source and try to maintain it's own copy.
> 
> The question I have is can libfdt be split out from dtc source, and
> become it's own thing. This way other userspace apps can easily download
> it and link with it?

Downloading isn't changed at all by splitting it out to it's own repo.

> The reason I ask is I have added dynamic manipulation support of device
> trees in memory into qemu for KVM. But the issue is keeping a copy of
> libfdt in the KVM userspace repository, which is getting some opposition
> (understandably). But this would be much easier if there was a libfdt
> repo for the library so that we wouldn't need to keep our own copy.

It seems the real crux of your issue is that you want distros to
provide a libfdt package.  That can be done by creating a subpackage
off of the dtc package.  The harder part for certain distros will be
either convincing them to allow the static libfdt to exist, or creating
a shared library for it instead.

josh

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-27 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-27 19:40 [dtc] breaking out libfdt from dtc so other progs can use it Jerone Young
2008-02-27 20:31 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2008-02-27 21:24   ` Jerone Young
2008-02-28  1:41 ` David Gibson
2008-02-28 16:30   ` Jerone Young
2008-02-28 18:59     ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-28 20:02       ` Jerone Young
2008-02-29  2:53         ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-02-29  8:35       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-29 14:09         ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-01  9:12         ` Fathi Boudra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080227143101.7a262aae@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
    --to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jyoung5@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).