From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] [POWERPC] Ignore disabled serial ports
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:43:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080302224317.15f259ca@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803030443.43346.arnd@arndb.de>
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 04:43:42 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 01 March 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/serial/of_serial.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/serial/of_serial.c
> > @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ static int __devinit of_platform_serial_
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0int port_type;
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0int ret;
> > =C2=A0
> > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0if (!of_device_is_available(=
ofdev->node)) {
> > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0dev_info(&ofdev->dev, "Disabled serial port. =C2=A0Ign=
ored\n");
> > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0return -ENODEV;
> > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0}
> > +
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0if (of_find_property(of=
dev->node, "used-by-rtas", NULL))
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0return -EBUSY;
>=20
> I wonder whether we should move the check for "used-by-rtas" into the
> of_device_is_available function. I understand that used-by-rtas is
> another way of expressing the idea that the kernel is not supposed to
> access the specific device. In this case, the device is physically
> present, but is not available to the OS.
I'd rather not at the moment. My intention was to only look at the
status property for now. I'd like to avoid this function growing into
a huge switch statement for $random_firmware's way of flagging
something as "don't touch".
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-01 14:16 [PATCH 1/2 v2] [OF] Add of_device_is_available function Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] [POWERPC] Ignore disabled serial ports Josh Boyer
2008-03-03 3:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-03 4:43 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2008-03-03 19:09 ` Scott Wood
2008-03-03 19:21 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-03 21:40 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-03-04 0:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-01 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/2][NEWEMAC] Use status property for unused/unwired EMACs Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 21:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-01 23:50 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-02 19:43 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-03-02 22:23 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] [OF] Add of_device_is_available function Stephen Rothwell
2008-03-01 22:25 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 23:48 ` [RESEND] " Josh Boyer
2008-03-24 11:39 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-03-24 11:45 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-25 4:47 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-03-25 11:51 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-26 14:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080302224317.15f259ca@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).