LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki@toshiba.co.jp>
To: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] celleb: move the base part for celleb support
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:04:21 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080307.160421.-1300529901.kouish@swc.toshiba.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803051236.57425.arnd@arndb.de>

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > This patch moves the base code for celleb support into platforms/cell/.
> > All files in this patch are used by celleb-beat and celleb-native commonly.
> 
> Moving around the files this way is good, but
> 
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile       2008-03-04 14:00:28.000000000  +0900 
> > @@ -26,3 +26,20 @@
> >                                          ? spufs/
> > 
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)                  += axon_msi.o
> > +
> > +
> > +# celleb stuff
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_CELLEB),y)
> > +obj-y                                  += celleb_setup.o \
> > +                                          celleb_pci.o celleb_scc_epci.o \
> > +                                          celleb_scc_pciex.o \
> > +                                          celleb_scc_uhc.o \
> > +                                          beat.o beat_htab.o beat_hvCall.o \
> > +                                          beat_interrupt.o beat_iommu.o \
> > +                                          io-workarounds.o spider-pci.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)                      += beat_smp.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_UDBG_BEAT)            += beat_udbg.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_TXX9)              += celleb_scc_sio.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPU_BASE)                 += beat_spu_priv1.o
> > +endif
> 
> This looks like you are referencing files in the Makefile that are moved
> in the later patches. In order to make the git-bisect work correctly
> on the kernel after the patches are applied, I'd suggest either moving
> all files at once, or to modify the Makefile in every step of the way
> so that the kernel still builds.

Thanks for your advice.

I'll split changing the Makefile because the moving patches is too
large to be one patch.

Best regards,
Kou Ishizaki

      reply	other threads:[~2008-03-07  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-05  8:23 [PATCH 2/11] celleb: move the base part for celleb support Ishizaki Kou
2008-03-05 11:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-07  7:04   ` Ishizaki Kou [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080307.160421.-1300529901.kouish@swc.toshiba.co.jp \
    --to=kou.ishizaki@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox