linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: ARCH=ppc -> ARCH=powerpc : help needed for dts file
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:46:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080311114601.GA19189@netgate.macqel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311003249.GG11559@localhost.localdomain>

Hi David,

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:32:49AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:31:09PM +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> > 
> > I now have a working linux on my mpc8540 based board, with support for
> > the compactflash disk and the i2c rtc.
> > 
> > The network tough, does not work yet. altough the the integrated ethernet
> > controller (FEC) seems to be recognized.  Could it be a problem with the phy ?
> > I notice that I do not have an entry for gfar_interrupt in /proc/interrupts
> > on my ethernet-missing linux, while I have one ont the working arch/ppc linux ?
> > Do I need to give the phy type in the dts file, and how ?
> > 
> > I would also like to know if it is possible to still get in linux the mac
> > address known by uboot when using a dts file, and how ?
> 
> This chiefly depends on whether you're using an old u-boot that
> doesn't know about the device tree, or a new u-boot which itself
> supplies a device tree to the kernel.
> 
> If the old u-boot, you'll need to write a bootwrapper for your
> platform which reads the bd_t and pokes the right mac addresses into
> the device tree.
> 
> If the new u-boot, u-boot itself should put the address into the
> device tree.  If it's not, why it's not is a u-boot question rather
> than a device tree question.

OK :(

Now back to the first an bigger problem :
currently, I have an "old" U-boot and I have written myself a dts file.

Problem is : ethernet does not work, but that's not a mac-address problem,
but something else that I do not understand yet.  The symptom is I get

	ip route add default via 192.168.85.33 dev eth0
	RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable

I surmise this is because my eth0 does not become up, and I surmise
again this is because there is no driver selected to drive the phy.

In my arch/ppc setup this was automagically handled by fixed@100:1 IIRC  

Is there something I can put in my dts file to activate a driver for my phy ?

Best regards

Philippe

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-11 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-03 14:47 ARCH=ppc -> ARCH=powerpc : help needed for dts file Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 14:54 ` Grant Likely
2008-03-03 17:07 ` Scott Wood
2008-03-03 21:05   ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 21:11     ` Scott Wood
2008-03-03 21:26       ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 21:41         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04  8:19           ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 21:55         ` Scott Wood
2008-03-04  8:08           ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-04  8:22             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04  9:10               ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-05  4:52                 ` David Gibson
2008-03-05  5:01                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-05 16:15                   ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-05 20:14                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-05 23:34                       ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-05 16:32                   ` Scott Wood
2008-03-05 23:46                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-07  0:10                       ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-07  0:19                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-09 22:31                           ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-09 22:36                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-11  0:32                             ` David Gibson
2008-03-11 11:46                               ` Philippe De Muyter [this message]
2008-03-11 22:42                                 ` David Gibson
2008-05-06 22:54                                 ` Andy Fleming
2008-05-07  7:50                                   ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-05-07  7:54                                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-03-03 21:26     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04  8:34       ` Philippe De Muyter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080311114601.GA19189@netgate.macqel \
    --to=phdm@macqel.be \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).