From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: ARCH=ppc -> ARCH=powerpc : help needed for dts file
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:42:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080311224200.GC7642@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311114601.GA19189@netgate.macqel>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:46:02PM +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:32:49AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:31:09PM +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > I now have a working linux on my mpc8540 based board, with support for
> > > the compactflash disk and the i2c rtc.
> > >
> > > The network tough, does not work yet. altough the the integrated ethernet
> > > controller (FEC) seems to be recognized. Could it be a problem with the phy ?
> > > I notice that I do not have an entry for gfar_interrupt in /proc/interrupts
> > > on my ethernet-missing linux, while I have one ont the working arch/ppc linux ?
> > > Do I need to give the phy type in the dts file, and how ?
> > >
> > > I would also like to know if it is possible to still get in linux the mac
> > > address known by uboot when using a dts file, and how ?
> >
> > This chiefly depends on whether you're using an old u-boot that
> > doesn't know about the device tree, or a new u-boot which itself
> > supplies a device tree to the kernel.
> >
> > If the old u-boot, you'll need to write a bootwrapper for your
> > platform which reads the bd_t and pokes the right mac addresses into
> > the device tree.
> >
> > If the new u-boot, u-boot itself should put the address into the
> > device tree. If it's not, why it's not is a u-boot question rather
> > than a device tree question.
>
> OK :(
>
> Now back to the first an bigger problem :
> currently, I have an "old" U-boot and I have written myself a dts file.
>
> Problem is : ethernet does not work, but that's not a mac-address problem,
> but something else that I do not understand yet. The symptom is I get
>
> ip route add default via 192.168.85.33 dev eth0
> RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable
>
> I surmise this is because my eth0 does not become up, and I surmise
> again this is because there is no driver selected to drive the phy.
>
> In my arch/ppc setup this was automagically handled by fixed@100:1 IIRC
>
> Is there something I can put in my dts file to activate a driver for
> my phy ?
Probably, but how phy selection works is dependent on the ethernet
driver, so I can't help you. You'll need someone familiar with the
driver in question (or read the code and figure it out).
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-11 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-03 14:47 ARCH=ppc -> ARCH=powerpc : help needed for dts file Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 14:54 ` Grant Likely
2008-03-03 17:07 ` Scott Wood
2008-03-03 21:05 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 21:11 ` Scott Wood
2008-03-03 21:26 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 8:19 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-03 21:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-03-04 8:08 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-04 8:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 9:10 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-05 4:52 ` David Gibson
2008-03-05 5:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-05 16:15 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-05 20:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-05 23:34 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-05 16:32 ` Scott Wood
2008-03-05 23:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-07 0:10 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-07 0:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-09 22:31 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-09 22:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-11 0:32 ` David Gibson
2008-03-11 11:46 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-03-11 22:42 ` David Gibson [this message]
2008-05-06 22:54 ` Andy Fleming
2008-05-07 7:50 ` Philippe De Muyter
2008-05-07 7:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-03-03 21:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 8:34 ` Philippe De Muyter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080311224200.GC7642@localhost.localdomain \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=phdm@macqel.be \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).