From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.parisc-linux.org (palinux.external.hp.com [192.25.206.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.parisc-linux.org", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FF8DDE24 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:51:20 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:02 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 kernel panic with "Exception: 501 " on powerpc Message-ID: <20080312175102.GC613@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080311011434.ad8c8d7d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47D7D2C9.4090001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080312104645.34e58319.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080312104645.34e58319.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kamalesh Babulal List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:46:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:25:37 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > Beats me. Maybe we're still enabling interrupts too early. But the new > semaphore code got fixed (didn't it?) On the 7th, according to my records. Easy to check -- look in kernel/semaphore.c and see whether down() is using spin_lock_irqsave (good) or spin_lock_irq (bad). -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."