From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C6ADDF9C for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:44:34 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2HLhJQT011961 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:43:19 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2HLiRkU127222 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:44:27 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2HLiQ0s004555 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:44:27 -0600 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:43:41 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver Message-ID: <20080317164341.12075616@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> References: <1205488348-22536-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <47DE5F43.80604@garzik.org> <1205789101.26869.181.camel@pasglop> <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese , Jeff Garzik , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:26:45 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 08:25 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pravin M. Bathija > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese > > > > --- > > > > drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 7 +++++++ > > > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > applied > > > > Thanks. There's also a couple of patches from Valentine that should go > > in. I'll ask him to resend to you. > > Actually, they need some arch bits so they are better off going through > Josh tree on top of the said changes. There's also the section mismatch patch I sent you. I don't care who's tree they go through, but I'd need to know either way so keep me in the loop please. josh