From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e34.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CEB0DDF3E for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:09:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2I18bbP025355 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:08:37 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2I19iFY175620 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:09:45 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2I19ho9018769 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:09:44 -0600 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:08:55 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver Message-ID: <20080317200855.2954971a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <47DEF159.3020504@garzik.org> References: <1205488348-22536-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <47DE5F43.80604@garzik.org> <1205789101.26869.181.camel@pasglop> <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> <20080317164341.12075616@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205790747.26869.187.camel@pasglop> <47DEF159.3020504@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese , netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:31:53 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >> There's also the section mismatch patch I sent you. I don't care who's > >> tree they go through, but I'd need to know either way so keep me in the > >> loop please. > > > > Jeff, do you mind if we get those patches through the powerpc tree ? > > EMAC is very powerpc specific and these are mostly internal driver > > cuisine. > > Fine with me in concept, though I haven't seen the patches in question. http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120449748701492&w=2 I sent it to Ben with netdev on CC because you asked the various people sending NEWEMAC patches to you to find a single person. So from now on, what are we going to do? It seems we're playing net maintainer russian roulette for NEWEMAC and it's getting old. josh