From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e3.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA84DDE1A for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:57:00 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2I3utwR010971 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:56:55 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2I3utpQ249054 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:56:55 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2I3uscS019128 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:56:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:56:06 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver Message-ID: <20080317225606.79f77502@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1205808100.26869.204.camel@pasglop> References: <1205488348-22536-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <47DE5F43.80604@garzik.org> <1205789101.26869.181.camel@pasglop> <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> <20080317164341.12075616@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205790747.26869.187.camel@pasglop> <47DEF159.3020504@garzik.org> <20080317200855.2954971a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1205808100.26869.204.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese , Jeff Garzik , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:41:40 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120449748701492&w=2 > > > > I sent it to Ben with netdev on CC because you asked the various people > > sending NEWEMAC patches to you to find a single person. > > > > So from now on, what are we going to do? It seems we're playing net > > maintainer russian roulette for NEWEMAC and it's getting old. > > I'm happy to collect the patches. I said I would do it, I was just taken > aback a bit by Jeff suddenly merging two of Stefan patches directly :-) > > I was actually planning this week to post a serie of all the pending > EMAC patches for final review. Ok. Either way, if it helps someone I'd be happy to roll them into a newemac branch in my git tree. josh