LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: unprivileged use of MSR_SE
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:24:07 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080320002407.D911C26F995@magilla.localdomain> (raw)

Are there any powerpc instructions that can read or change the MSR
explicitly from user mode?  Any that can see or affect the MSR_SE bit?

e.g. x86 has pushf/popf unprivileged instructions, with which a user
program can both see the single-step flag set, and enable single-step for
its own next instruction (presumably when it has a handler for SIGTRAP).
This actually gets used in arcane places.

I recall being told before there's no unprivileged way to see or touch
MSR_SE.  But it looks to me like a user program can set the bit in a
sigcontext and sigreturn to set it.  Is that intentionally supported?
Or could sigreturn ignore the MSR_SE bit without breaking any strange user?

On x86 do we some machinations so that PTRACE_GETREGS et al show the
single-step bit set if user-mode itself had set it, but not if
PTRACE_SINGLESTEP set it.  If you use PTRACE_SETREGS et al to set the
single-step bit, then it stays set even if you use PTRACE_CONT.

I'd like to clean this up for powerpc too.  If there is no way at all for
user-mode to set MSR_SE, then it doesn't much matter whether it shows up
when ptrace reads it--ptrace just needs to ignore attempts to set it.  So
if there's no reason not to, what I would do is remove MSR_SE from the
MSR_DEBUGCHANGE mask and make sigreturn always clear MSR_SE.

Does that make sense?


Thanks,
Roland

             reply	other threads:[~2008-03-20  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-20  0:24 Roland McGrath [this message]
2008-03-20  4:10 ` unprivileged use of MSR_SE Paul Mackerras
2008-03-20  7:43   ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-20  4:15 ` Paul Mackerras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080320002407.D911C26F995@magilla.localdomain \
    --to=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox