From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e33.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D63EDE001 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:06:09 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2R162Ca031111 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:06:02 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2R161eg220526 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:06:01 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2R1616T028691 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:06:01 -0600 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:03:23 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: "Dave Cogley" Subject: Re: ppc platform for AMCC-440EPx - ELDK to the rescue Message-ID: <20080326200323.69eac31f@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <006e01c88f94$9dafe020$2001a8c0@DCOGLEYNEW> References: <20080326130837.762DBDE2FB@ozlabs.org> <20080326222247.337AB242FC@gemini.denx.de> <006e01c88f94$9dafe020$2001a8c0@DCOGLEYNEW> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:56:23 -0700 "Dave Cogley" wrote: > Wolfgang, > > Could you provide an explanation between the two architectures in the ELDK? > > > I am also using a Sequoia "spin off" and am trying to determine why I would > want to use the "powerpc" architecture vs. the "ppc" architecture. arch/ppc is being removed entirely from the kernel.org kernels in June. josh