From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Jens Osterkamp <jens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: maxim@de.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTAS - adapt procfs interface
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:04:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401200404.GS7137@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401163504.GP7137@localdomain>
Nathan Lynch wrote:
>
> One could argue that the real problem is using the proc_dir_entry's
> reference count to enforce exclusive open.
I think this is better... the way these files are used is lame, but
this should preserve the existing behavior. I haven't yet tested
this, can you?
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c
index f227659..00bc308 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct rtas_validate_flash_t
unsigned int update_results; /* Update results token */
};
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(flash_file_open_lock);
+static atomic_t open_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static struct proc_dir_entry *firmware_flash_pde;
static struct proc_dir_entry *firmware_update_pde;
static struct proc_dir_entry *validate_pde;
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int rtas_flash_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
uf->flist = NULL;
}
- atomic_dec(&dp->count);
+ atomic_dec(&open_count);
return 0;
}
@@ -352,26 +352,17 @@ static ssize_t rtas_flash_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
static int rtas_excl_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
- struct proc_dir_entry *dp = PDE(inode);
-
- /* Enforce exclusive open with use count of PDE */
- spin_lock(&flash_file_open_lock);
- if (atomic_read(&dp->count) > 1) {
- spin_unlock(&flash_file_open_lock);
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&open_count) > 1) {
+ atomic_dec(&open_count);
return -EBUSY;
}
- atomic_inc(&dp->count);
- spin_unlock(&flash_file_open_lock);
-
return 0;
}
static int rtas_excl_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
- struct proc_dir_entry *dp = PDE(inode);
-
- atomic_dec(&dp->count);
+ atomic_dec(&open_count);
return 0;
}
@@ -580,7 +571,7 @@ static int validate_flash_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
}
/* The matching atomic_inc was in rtas_excl_open() */
- atomic_dec(&dp->count);
+ atomic_dec(&open_count);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 13:12 [PATCH] RTAS - adapt procfs interface Jens Osterkamp
2008-04-01 16:35 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-04-01 20:04 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2008-04-02 11:34 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-04-02 11:48 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-02 18:54 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-04-02 11:33 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-04-04 0:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-04 5:39 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Arnd Bergmann
2008-04-04 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080401200404.GS7137@localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=jens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=maxim@de.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).