From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9841DE3D5 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:36:26 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:36:16 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Freescale QUICC Engine USB Host Controller Message-ID: <20080403153616.GH6857@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <20080311191744.GA10518@localhost.localdomain> <200804031545.51834.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20080403143052.GA5955@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <47F4F8B0.4090708@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <47F4F8B0.4090708@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Brownell , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:33:04AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > My only concern is that the functions are still called cpm_xxxx even though they > apply to the CPM and the QE. Sure, the QE is really just CPM3, but I'd like to > see a nomenclature that's more inclusive. Yeah, but cpmqe would be too clunky. I went with cpm since it has seniority. -Scott