From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CACDDE456 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 03:29:07 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:38:58 -0500 From: Olof Johansson To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git Message-ID: <20080404163858.GA25717@lixom.net> References: <20080317222836.AFA66241A2@gemini.denx.de> <47E938A8.9000103@semihalf.com> <47F22C9A.4050501@semihalf.com> <47F60D5D.5090402@semihalf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:14:34AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > > I'm thinking 'optimized' defconfigs should go into a subdirectory. > > > > > > > > This requires a change to the top-level Makefile and shepherding this > > > > change upstream. Could we perhaps try to avoid this by having optimized > > > > defconfigs in the form of, for example: > > > > I don't think changes are required to put them in a subdir: > > > > $ mkdir arch/powerpc/configs/optimized > > $ cp arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_defconfig > > arch/powerpc/configs/optimized/lite5200_defconfig > > $ make optimized/lite5200_defconfig > > > > This works for me. > > However, I'm not sure what the naming scheme should be for subdirectories. > > board vendor? > host processor? > just one big directory for board specific defconfigs? > > Olof, Kumar, Josh; any thoughts? > > Not that it matters much; files are easy to move around later. I really like the idea. It would probably make sense to organize it in the same way as the platforms are done today, i.e. per processor/platform family. And then have shared/merged configs in the main config directory. -Olof