linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: MPIC ack interrupts at mpic_teardown_this_cpu()
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:39:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080404193942.GA27748@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63defd942bd57ca87cb17334832b615c@kernel.crashing.org>

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 08:55:01PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> platforms/maple/setup.c and platforms/powermac/pic.c use
>>> MPIC_WANTS_RESET.
>>> Is there a reason why we don't do that on every MPIC?  If there is  
>>> such
>>> a reason, the default should be to reset, only pseries and chrp and  
>>> cell
>>> and now pasemi do not use it.  It's the only sane way to get an MPIC
>>> into
>>> a sane known state starting from <whatever> state.
>>
>> I used to have the reset there on pasemi but due to some other issues I
>> ended up taking it out.
>>
>> It's not like doing a final EOI is a big deal, I really don't see why
>> there's hassle about this patch.
>
> The patch is fine, don't get me wrong.  I'm just saying MPIC_WANTS_RESET
> should be the default since pretty much everything wants it.  The few
> platforms that don't can document why; with the current code, we cannot
> see if you just forgot it or not.

It was documented in the changeset, see de0c74e7f98d8a06b784e120103eb388da8194f6.

But yeah, that's hard to tell at some point later in time, a short
comment by the call could be useful. I'll add one next time I touch that
code.


-Olof

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-04 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-03 19:09 [PATCH] PowerPC: MPIC ack interrupts at mpic_teardown_this_cpu() Valentine Barshak
2008-04-03 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-04  5:29   ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-04 17:38     ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-04-04 18:03       ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-04 18:55         ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-04-04 19:39           ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2008-04-07 14:24 ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080404193942.GA27748@lixom.net \
    --to=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).