From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (chilli.pcug.org.au [203.10.76.44]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1ADDDEDA for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:24:44 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:24:30 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 83xx/85xx: Reorganize defconfigs Message-Id: <20080410142430.256fd23e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <6BE67DBD-325A-4628-8480-7EA0FE79DBE5@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20080410103131.f0dcf730.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <6BE67DBD-325A-4628-8480-7EA0FE79DBE5@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__10_Apr_2008_14_24_30_+1000_GQPqN6q5gKUD/sme" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Signature=_Thu__10_Apr_2008_14_24_30_+1000_GQPqN6q5gKUD/sme Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:11:38 -0500 Kumar Gala wr= ote: > > Yeah the are mpc85xx_defconfig and mpc83xx_defconfig. So should we add mpc83xx_defconfig to the kisskb builds and remove mpc885_ads_defconfig (we already do a mpc85xx_defconfig build)? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__10_Apr_2008_14_24_30_+1000_GQPqN6q5gKUD/sme Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH/ZaDTgG2atn1QN8RAqjxAJ4j9lSeapMdYA1xTiBDMXep6dWOgwCeLg9R AJYlkHZofFmb4O1g5jZrxlQ= =GRcS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__10_Apr_2008_14_24_30_+1000_GQPqN6q5gKUD/sme--