From: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Using two baud rate generators with the cpm_uart driver
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:54:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804151754.21664.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4804CB12.1000308@freescale.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1869 bytes --]
Hi Scott,
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 17:34, Scott Wood wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > thanks to a bad hardware design decision, I'm faced with a software issue
> > with the cpm_uart driver.
> >
> > My hardware uses either SCC4 or SMC2 (production-time option) as an RS485
> > port with an external transceiver. The transceiver's data direction is
> > controlled by external logic that monitors the SCC4/SMC2 TxD signal.
> >
> > The external logic needs an input clock at the baud rate frequency on the
> > MPC8248 BRG5 output pin (although I could modify it to accept an input
> > clock at 16x the baud rate frequency). This means the cpm_uart driver has
> > to setup two baud rate generators instead of one.
> >
> > The ppc architecture was easy to hack as it used a fs_uart_platform_info
> > structure in which I added a set_brg function pointer provided by platform
> > code. This isn't possible with the powerpc architecture anymore.
> >
> > Is there a clean way to fix this issue ? Kicking the hardware designer
> > won't help :-)
>
> Maybe not, but it'd be satisfying. :-)
Don't tempt me :-)
> The clean solution would be to have an abstracted clock API, similar to
> phylib, where the caller doesn't know details about BRGs and such.
> Maybe the linux/clk.h API would be suitable; I haven't looked at it in
> detail.
The clock API would have to be quite advanced to express things like "the SCC4
clock is a combination of BRG2 and BRG5" (and I don't even consider
adding "with BRG2 set to 16x the baud rate and BRG5 to the baud rate").
I'm not even sure a generic API should be developed to solve my problem. I'm
more looking for a not too dirty hack.
--
Laurent Pinchart
CSE Semaphore Belgium
Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A
B-1410 Waterloo
Belgium
T +32 (2) 387 42 59
F +32 (2) 387 42 75
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-15 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-15 13:32 [RFC] Using two baud rate generators with the cpm_uart driver Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-15 15:34 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-15 15:54 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2008-04-15 15:59 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-15 16:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804151754.21664.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--to=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).