From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.171]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7635DDE28F for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:12:10 +1000 (EST) From: Laurent Pinchart To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-pcf8563: Add device ids table Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:11:56 +0200 References: <200804171708.32847.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20080419162358.746b714c@hyperion.delvare> <480A2117.7020502@scram.de> In-Reply-To: <480A2117.7020502@scram.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart22813803.oepq2cn4Ao"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200804221612.06745.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, i2c@lm-sensors.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --nextPart22813803.oepq2cn4Ao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jean, On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:09:55 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > >> Hi Jean, > >> > >>>>> Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 scheduled > >>>>> for 2.6.26 ? > >>>> hope so! :) > >>> Note that this patch depends on i2c patches which aren't upstream yet. > >> Is there any chance they will got to 2.6.26? > >=20 > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at it myself, but I am > > under the impression that the powerpc folks are tired of having to wait > > for me and may push it to Linus through their tree? That would be fine > > with me, as I don't want to be the one delaying something many > > developers want (but I also can't sign patches I've not even read.) >=20 > The required patches are: >=20 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=3D17833 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=3D17834 >=20 > which are just the forward ported patches you sent to the poweprc mailing > list some time ago:=20 >=20 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=3D16282 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=3D16283 Given that the required patches are just forward-ported versions of patches= =20 you sent (and thus probably reviewed as well :-)), what's the best way to g= et=20 them in 2.6.26 (if at all possible) ? Best regards, =2D-=20 Laurent Pinchart CSE Semaphore Belgium Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A B-1410 Waterloo Belgium T +32 (2) 387 42 59 =46 +32 (2) 387 42 75 --nextPart22813803.oepq2cn4Ao Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIDfI28y9gWxC9vpcRAtfwAJwOmE1mpU/4Au0hU+65yO7bNacEYwCgpRtx r4nrrYL/G06uKy++uyRK70E= =4Lrd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart22813803.oepq2cn4Ao--